Pioneering the Next Frontier in Subsurface Exploration

About MinBioteck

MinBioteck represents a breakthrough in mineral exploration, pioneering a unified methodology that integrates two independent, novel data streams for a new level of targeting accuracy. Our approach is built on a fundamental understanding of the deep connection between geology and biology.

What’s in a name: MinBioteck is a concatenation of two words: Minerals and Biotechnology

Advanced Biostatistical Analysis: We utilise cutting-edge genetic and genomic techniques to analyse surface microbial ecosystems, identifying distinct biological signatures that have a viable correlation with subsurface mineralisation.

This is our current operational stage.

High-Precision Geochemical Field Mapping: We are actively developing a novel method for mapping biogeochemical fields using high-precision sensor arrays. Our theoretical framework suggests that by applying proprietary signal processing, we can isolate localised, geologically significant anomalies from regional and time-varying effects. This research forms the second key pillar of our integrated exploration model and is a primary focus of our ongoing validation work.

Fusing these two complementary lines of evidence allows us to overcome the ambiguity inherent in conventional exploration techniques.

MinBioteck was founded by Andrew Bisset, a multidisciplinary scientist with expertise spanning Mathematics, Physics, Geology, Geophysics, Exploration, Biomedical Science, Biotechnology and Bioinformatics. This unique synthesis of knowledge is the engine of our innovation. No matter which area of science you come from, we speak your language!

Our focus is on the strategic application and advancement of our methods. We engage in a limited number of collaborative pilot programs with forward-thinking partners. These programs are structured as research-intensive partnerships designed to solve challenging exploration problems and deliver a decisive competitive advantage.

For inquiries about strategic partnerships, please use our contact form.

FAQ

What makes your exploration technology method different from traditional models?

Our technology is fundamentally different because it integrates a novel biological data stream derived from the biostatistical analysis of microbial ecosystems. Our technology focuses on understanding the geological target and matching that to specific biological patterns. We fuse complementary lines of evidence to identify high-confidence targets. Our in-house expertise allows us to match biological signals with geophysics and geology, effectively adding another layer of information to the exploration vector. The fundamental difference is that we aim to deliver a subsurface map of your target mineral.

What type of mineral systems are suited to your technology?

Our technology is conceptually effective for a wide range of mineral systems where there is a measurable interaction between the ore body and the surrounding environment. While our research has shown exceptional promise, we are actively seeking to validate our methods across diverse geological settings and commodity types through our collaborative pilot programs. Each new mineral test requires an understanding of the likely biological response within a given geological situation. We are confident that our technology is effective for:

– A majority of massive and disseminated sulphide systems (EM and IP targets)
– Nickel sulphides (but not laterite deposits)
– Uranium mineralisation, including unconformity-related, paleochannel and sandstone
– Orogenic gold + others
– IOCG style
– Porphyry Cu-Au
– Kimberlite pipes
– Mineralised pegmatites (spodumene)
– Most copper mineralised systems
– SEDEX style deposits
– Carbonatites
– REE
– A majority of base metals

Who is this service for?

We are not a large-scale survey contractor however we do conduct limited field trials. We are a specialist R&D firm led by our founding scientist. We are highly selective and prefer to partner with forward-thinking junior exploration companies on projects that present a compelling scientific or exploration challenge. Although we can conduct field trials, our capacity is limited and currently geographically constrained to Western Australia (for now).

What is the typical timeline for a project?

Due to the research-intensive nature of our work, which includes detailed laboratory analysis, timelines are longer than for standard geological and geophysical surveys. A typical pilot program can take 1-2 months from initial survey to final report, however we aim to turn around samples as quickly as possible. We prioritise scientific rigour and accuracy over speed.

Do you have case studies to demonstrate your claims?

The results and data from our client-funded pilot programs are treated as strictly confidential and are the property of our partners. Therefore, we do not publish detailed public case studies. However, generalised, anonymised results and the scientific principles of our methodology can be discussed in detail under a mutual Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA).

How are samples collected and processed?

Sample collection is low impact requiring around 50 grams of soil taken from 15 cm below the surface. Samples are collected, stored and transported as biological specimens (ideally at <4 °C). Processing uses proprietary methods. Due to the extreme sensitivity of analysis and potential for sample contamination, it is not advisable for clients to collect samples and submit them for processing. However, with training, clients can collect and submit samples themselves.

Is your technology environmentally sensitive?

Yes. Our field methodology is low-impact and non-invasive. It involves the surface collection of small-volume soil samples requiring no ground clearing. Subject to statistically appropriate intervals, sample sites can be selected to avoid interaction with culturally and environmentally sensitive areas while delivering an accurate map of subsurface mineralisation. There are no direct emissions associated with the collection and processing of samples.

How much does it cost?

Due to the bespoke, research-intensive nature of each pilot program, there is no standard price list.

It is important to realise that the results delivered are often drill-ready targets with accurate indicators of depth, distribution and (potentially) grade for a range of commodities from just a single survey. Furthermore, targets with high failure rates like electromagnetic conductors and disseminated sulphides can be effectively screened for economic mineralisation before drilling.

To provide a general indication of scale, the investment for a comprehensive pilot program is comparable to that of other high-value exploration techniques, such as a targeted specialist geophysical survey or a preliminary reconnaissance drilling program. This reflects the significant costs associated with specialised genomic laboratory work, proprietary data processing, and expert scientific interpretation.

What type of mineral system generates the clearest signal with your technology?

Our methodology is most effective in detecting systems that generate a strong and coherent biogeochemical signal. Logically, world-class mineral systems—those that are large, high-grade, and under cover produce the most distinct and persistent signatures. This results in the highest possible signal-to-noise ratio in our data, allowing for the most unambiguous interpretation and confident targeting.

What is the depth of investigation?

This is a fundamental scientific question that is undergoing ongoing investigation. We have detected surface anomalies (through drilling) related to mineralisation beneath 200 metres of cover. We anticipate that the depth of investigation will be linked to the size and tenor of mineralisation. There are unknown biological constants in the mathematical framework that once determined, will allow a more rigorous and quantifiable determination for depth of investigation. A Tier One scale deposit will have an unambiguous signal, even under several hundred metres of barren cover.

How accurate is your method?

The results have been consistently accurate in relation to tests conducted over known mineralisation. There is a high level of spatial correlation (accuracy) between surface indicators and buried mineralisation. However, the 3D precision in our voxel solutions requires refinement. Whilst accurate, the precision can be improved. These are refinements that can be addressed through an improved theoretical understanding of the physics and/or geo-biological interactions. But let’s be honest, there is nothing for us to work off – no research, no published papers. We are writing the textbook as we go.

Are there biosecurity restrictions for sample submission

MinBioteck is based in Perth, Western Australia, a State that has the world’s strictest biosecurity regulations. Generally, samples collected within WA (excluding quarantine regions) are not subject to transport or analysis restrictions. Samples collected outside WA but still within Australia are subject to strict quarantine requirements. Heat treatment of samples is not possible. At 95 °C, dsDNA unravels. At 121 °C, hydrolysis and fragmented DNA disrupts sensitivity. At 160 °C, DNA undergoes catastrophic shearing, rendering it unusable for sequencing. Despite the restrictions, there are avenues to import soil samples into WA and maintain their biological viability. Samples collected outside of Australia cannot be imported for analysis.

Do you use Machine Learning or AI?

We use tools that are appropriate and cost-effective for the task at hand. The physics and associated mathematical equations are unknown in the current scientific literature, which requires a unique approach to solve these problems.

Are results impacted by the type of cover?

Generally not. If we assume that surface soils are undisturbed by any recent anthropogenic activity (within the last 5 years), then the type of cover should have no influence on microbial colonisation. The microorganisms are relying on subsurface mineralisation, not the surface soil profile.